I ended my Part 1 blog on this topic with the comment that the internal ego state model can be a useful way to understand what is happening when people are displaying prejudiced behaviour. Here is a repeat of that diagram, about which I wrote as follows in my 1993 article.
In Part 1 of this blog I set the scene in my article and now in Part 2 I have reproduced for you what I wrote about prejudice and internal ego states. In Part 3 I will look at behavioural ego states and channels of communication, and finally in Part 4 I give some ideas about the game of PC – Politically Correct’. References Hay, Julie (1993) TA and ADP – What can Transactional Analysis contribute to Anti-Discriminatory Practice? INTAD Newsletter 2:1 4-8 In 1993 there was not so much attention being paid to referencing. Additional references that apply for this blog are: Internal ego states - Hay, Julie (1992) Transactional Analysis for Trainers Maidenhead: McGraw-Hill (currently published as 2nd edition, 2009, Hertford: Sherwood Publishing Rubberband – Kupfer, David & Haimowitz, Morris (1971) Therapeutic Interventions Part 1 Rubberbands Now. Transactional Analysis Journal 1:1 10-16 © 2018 Julie Hay
Julie is a fan of open access publishing so feel free to reproduce any of these blogs as long as you still attribute it to her.
1 Comment
Kiran
7/6/2018 15:18:49
Hi Julie, the practical example was very useful and made me realise how these concepts appear in inter relational conflicts in office scenarios. Please keep adding such scenarios in the articles. Thank you 😊.
Reply
Your comment will be posted after it is approved.
Leave a Reply. |
Categories
All
Archives
August 2019
|